Nagi Hanatani vs Ari Matsumoto Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L W L W L
Form
W W L W L L W L L LHead-2-Head: Hanatani 2 - 0 Matsumoto
They have played 5 sets in total, with Hanatani winning 4 and Matsumoto winning 1. The last match between Hanatani and Matsumoto was at the W25 Kofu, 29-03-2023, First, Hard with Nagi Hanatani getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nagi Hanatani | 2 |
| Ari Matsumoto | 0 |
W25 Kofu(29-03-2023)
3
6
6
1
6
2
| Hanatani | Stats | Matsumoto |
|---|---|---|
| 35% (6-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-1) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 759 | Ranking | 891 |
| 356 | Highest Rank | 669 |
| 30 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 45% (269-335) | Career Total W/L | 50% (55-54) |
| $5,050 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Nagi Hanatani
Player
Ari Matsumoto
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
112)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Nagi Hanatani
Player
Ari Matsumoto
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 27 | Games Won | 16 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:1:30 | Average Match Time | 2:1:30 |
| 72% (92/128) | 1st Serve % | 69% (117/170) |
| 64% (59/92) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (63/117) |
| 44% (16/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (21/53) |
| 55% (12/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (6/16) |
| 51% (86/170) | Return Points Win % | 41% (53/128) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nagi Hanatani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rose Marie Nijkamp
Player
Nagi Hanatani
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Demi Tran
Player
Nagi Hanatani
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Nagi Hanatani
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fang An Lin
Player
Nagi Hanatani
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ya-Yi Yang
Player
Nagi Hanatani
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 2-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Ari Matsumoto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mio Mushika
Player
Ari Matsumoto
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nanari Katsumi
Player
Ari Matsumoto
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 5-7 10-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 5-7 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Riko Kikawada
Player
Ari Matsumoto
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45% (269/335) | Win/Loss | 50% (55/54) |
| 45% (617/745) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (127/121) |
| 48% (5971/6436) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1137/1097) |
| 45% (153/190) | Hard Win/Loss | 46% (22/26) |
| 46% (57/67) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) |
| 45% (44/54) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (26/19) |
| 38% (15/24) | Grass Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 132 | Aces Total | 31 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1597 | Total Double Faults | 88 |
| 1:5:53 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 506.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 483.11 |
| 64% (16255/25394) | 1st Serve % | 66% (2431/3672) |
| 56% (9052/16255) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (1346/2431) |
| 42% (3853/9138) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (582/1241) |
| 48% (1542/3235) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (206/446) |
| 46% (11801/25571) | Return Points Win % | 45% (1691/3747) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (2/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (205/260) | Challenger W/L | 45% (31/38) |
| 47% (62/69) | Futures W/L | 60% (24/16) |
| 44% (263/598) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (55/109) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (52/88) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
| 46% (73/158) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (13/30) |
| 83% (281/233) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (57/48) |
| 17% (281/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (57/9) |
| 11% (322/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (52/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
